Does a funeral home need a website if AI is going to answer families’ questions for it? A claim is doing the rounds in marketing videos that business websites will soon be all but useless, because AI assistants and agents will find, compare and contact businesses on people’s behalf.

The claim draws on something real. In April 2026, Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai told the Cheeky Pint podcast: “If I fast-forward, a lot of what are just information-seeking queries will be agentic in Search. You’ll be completing tasks. You’ll have many threads running.” A moment later he added: “Search would be an agent manager in which you’re doing a lot of things.” [1]

So will a funeral home still need a website? Yes. But its job is changing, and a funeral director who keeps judging it by the old job will misread what is happening.

Will funeral homes still need a website as AI search grows?

Yes. On the evidence available, funeral homes will still need a website as AI search grows, because AI answers are built from web content. Google states that its generative AI features are rooted in its core Search ranking and quality systems. What will change is the website’s job, from attracting clicks to being the accurate, first-party source that Google, AI assistants and families check.

The debate usually runs two separate ideas together. The first is that fewer people click through to websites from Google. That is true, and the evidence is covered below. The second is that websites therefore stop mattering. That does not follow.

Google’s own guidance on its generative AI features is direct about where those answers come from: “our generative AI features on Google Search are rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems” [2]. An AI Overview that summarises local funeral options is summarising pages Google has indexed. If a funeral director’s pages are thin, out of date or missing, the summary is built from someone else’s.

What has changed is the job the website does. It is read more often by software and consulted more often as a second check, and it is clicked less often as a first stop.

What it used to doWhat it is becoming
Win the click from a Google searchSupply the facts Google and AI assistants summarise
Persuade a stranger from scratchConfirm a recommendation made elsewhere, by AI, a friend or a hospice
Act as an online brochureHold legally required price information (UK)
Collect form enquiriesProvide a reliable contact point for people and, increasingly, software
Measured by visitsMeasured by calls, enquiries and arrangements

That last row matters most. IFM judges a funeral director’s website by the enquiries it supports, not by sessions in an analytics report. A website that gets fewer visits but is quoted accurately in AI answers and confirms a family’s choice before they call is doing its job. The wider picture of how this works is set out in our guide to AI search for funeral homes.

Click a reader to see what it takes from the website

Search and AI systems

People

Regulation (UK)

Select a reader above to see what it relies on a funeral home website for.

Illustrative summary of documented behaviour and UK regulation, not a screenshot of any product.

Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai said in April 2026 that many information-seeking queries will become agentic, with Search acting as an agent manager. He did not say websites will stop mattering, and his widely repeated 2027 inflection-point comment was about AI running internal business processes such as company forecasts, not about search or websites.

The interview was an episode of Cheeky Pint, published on 7 April 2026 and hosted by John Collison with Elad Gil [1]. The quotes below are taken from the published transcript.

Agentic search, in plain terms, means software that completes a task across several sites instead of handing the person a list of links. Pichai’s description of Search as an “agent manager” fits that: the person states a goal, and several agents work on it at once.

The 2027 remark is where most commentary goes wrong. John Collison asked when Google might produce its first fully agentic business forecast, with no human in the loop. Pichai replied: “I definitely expect in some of these areas, ’27, to be an important inflection point for certain things.” That is a comment about AI taking over internal work inside companies. It is not a prediction that websites become less important, and he did not call 2027 the year of the AI agent.

He also struck a more measured note elsewhere in the same conversation. He called the current period “an expansionary moment” that “feels so far from a zero-sum game”, and said that only “0.1% of the world” is living this future today [1].

Here is what actually exists in September 2026, and whether any of it touches a UK funeral director yet:

DevelopmentWhat it isStatus (Sept 2026)UK relevance
Google AI optimisation guidanceHow Google’s AI features select and use contentPublished May 2026 [2]Applies to UK sites now
Agent2Agent (A2A)Open standard for AI agents to discover each other and share tasksv1.0 in March 2026, 150+ organisations [3]Infrastructure, not a consumer feature
WebMCPProposed standard letting websites expose actions to AI agents in the browserExperimental origin trial, Chrome 149 [4]Developer trial only
Meta Muse callingAI assistant places phone calls to businessesBeta, US businesses only [5]Not available in the UK

Why are funeral home websites getting fewer clicks from Google?

Funeral home websites are getting fewer clicks because Google increasingly answers searches on the results page. In US data, 68% of Google searches ended without a click in early 2026 (SparkToro), and an AI Overview cuts clicks to the top result by about 58% (Ahrefs). Local searches often end in a phone call from the Local Pack instead, which is an enquiry, not a lost visit.

The evidence on falling clicks is strong, but almost all of it is from the US or from global datasets. There is no equivalent published UK study, so treat the figures below as the best available direction, not a UK measurement.

SparkToro found that 68% of US Google searches in the first four months of 2026 ended without a click to any website [6], up from 58.5% in its 2024 study [7]. Separately, Ahrefs found that when an AI Overview appears, the page in position one gets about 58% fewer clicks [8], up from 34.5% in its April 2025 study [9]. The two 58% figures measure different things, one the share of all searches with no click, the other the loss of clicks for a top result, so they should not be added together.

StudyMarketFindingDate
SparkToroUS68% of searches ended without a click (58.5% in 2024)June 2026
Ahrefs, 300,000 keywordsGlobal Search Console dataAI Overview linked to 58% lower click-through for position one (34.5% in April 2025)June 2026, December 2025 data
Pew Research Center, 900 adultsUSClicked a result on 8% of visits with an AI summary, 15% without; 1% clicked a link inside the summary22 July 2025
Agarwal and Sen (ISB and Carnegie Mellon), 1,065 usersUSAI Overviews cut organic clicks by 38% where they appeared; draft paper, not peer reviewedApril 2026
Seer Interactive (agency data)53 client brandsOrganic click-through on AI Overview queries recovered from 1.3% to 2.4% between December 2025 and February 2026April 2026

The Pew Research Center study [10] is the clearest picture of ordinary behaviour, because it tracked what people actually did rather than estimating it.

Visits where users clicked a result, no AI summary15%
Visits where users clicked a result, with an AI summary8%
Browsing data from 900 US adults, March 2025. Source: Pew Research Center, 22 July 2025

A randomised field experiment by Saharsh Agarwal and Ananya Sen found a similar effect, with AI Overviews reducing organic clicks by 38% on the searches where they appeared [11]. Balance matters here too. Seer Interactive’s 2026 update found click-through on AI Overview queries recovering after 18 months of decline [12]. Semrush found that the zero-click rate on the same keywords fell slightly, from 33.75% to 31.53%, once AI Overviews began appearing for them [13]. Google, for its part, says it “consistently direct[s] billions of clicks to websites daily” [14].

For a funeral director, the exposure is uneven. Informational searches, such as what a funeral costs or what to do when someone dies at home, are the ones most likely to be answered on the results page. A “funeral directors near me” search often ends with a family tapping the call button in the Local Pack. That is a zero-click search, but it is not a lost enquiry. It is the reason to count calls and arrangements, not website sessions.

What happens when a funeral home’s information lives somewhere else?

When a funeral home’s notices, obituaries and service details live mainly on third-party platforms, AI answers cite those platforms instead. In IFM’s analysis of Google AI mentions for US funeral home website queries (September 2026), legacy.com was mentioned 4,864 times while individual funeral home domains were mentioned once each.

AI answers have to cite something. If the funeral director is not the clearest source of its own information, another site becomes that source.

IFM ran this test using the DataForSEO LLM Mentions data for Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode in the United States, looking at queries containing “funeral home website”. Across 13,406 mentions, the domains AI answers named most often were these [15]:

Domain named in Google AI answersMentionsType
legacy.com4,864Obituary platform
youtube.com1,536Video platform
familysearch.org1,280Genealogy
tributearchive.com1,280Obituary platform
everloved.com1,024Memorial platform
facebook.com768Social network
Individual funeral home domains1 eachFuneral homes

Method: IFM analysis of DataForSEO LLM Mentions data, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, United States, partial match on the phrase “funeral home website”, retrieved 23 September 2026. Equivalent UK citation data was not available in the dataset.

Mentions of legacy.com in Google AI answers4864
Mentions of a typical individual funeral home domain1
US funeral home website queries, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, September 2026. Source: IFM analysis of DataForSEO LLM Mentions data

The families asking these questions are mostly looking for things funeral directors create: notices, obituaries, service times and details about the person who has died. The funeral home wrote the content. The platform received the mention.

This fits a wider pattern. Pew found that Wikipedia, YouTube and Reddit were among the most common sources in Google’s AI summaries [10]. Large third-party sites start with an advantage, and a small local business has to be deliberate about being the source for its own facts.

The UK version of the same question is funeral notices, which attract around 33,100 searches a month (IFM keyword data, September 2026). This is not a case against notice platforms, which reach people and are where families expect to look. It is a case for publishing on the funeral home’s own website as well, so that the business is an original source rather than only a name inside someone else’s page.

Is a Google Business Profile enough without a website?

A Google Business Profile is not enough on its own. It helps families find a funeral director and call, but the business does not control the platform, and it is not a practical home for the price information UK funeral directors must publish online under the CMA Funerals Market Investigation Order 2021, which requires a separate Standardised Price List PDF one link from the home page of a firm’s website.

The CMA rules are precise. A funeral director’s website must carry all the information displayed in branch, in appropriately named PDFs, and “the Standardised Price List must be displayed in a PDF separate to all other information, accessible in one link from the home page” [16]. A firm without a website is not excused: if it markets its services online, it must display the information on those online channels or social media platforms instead [17].

So, strictly, UK law does not require a website. It requires the price information to be online somewhere. For most independents, a website they control is the simplest and most reliable place to meet that duty.

Discovery is spread across several channels, and US data shows how quickly that can change. The US National Funeral Directors Association found in 2025 that 40% of consumers had used a funeral home they found on Facebook, up from 21% in 2023 [18]. Each channel does a different job:

Google Business ProfileFacebook pageOwn website
Who controls itGoogleMetaThe funeral director
Full price information (CMA, UK)Not suitedPossible, awkwardRequired location if a site exists
Notices and obituariesNoPosts onlyYes, permanent pages
Source for AI answersYes, business factsLimitedYes, full first-party detail
Main jobGet found and calledCommunity reachGet chosen and verified

A Google Business Profile and a website are not rivals. The profile gets a funeral director found. The website helps a family choose, and gives Google and AI tools the detail the profile cannot hold.

Diagram showing a family finding a funeral director through an AI answer or Google map listing, checking prices, team, notices and 24-hour phone on the funeral home's website, then phoning
Google and AI answers get a funeral director found. The website is where a family checks prices, people and notices before calling.

What does a funeral home website do that AI cannot?

A funeral home website does five things AI cannot do for itself: it publishes the business’s own verified facts, lets families check a recommendation, holds required price information, carries first-hand content such as notices and named staff, and gives people a direct way to make contact.

AI assistants summarise what exists. They do not know a funeral director’s prices, opening arrangements or the name of the person who answers the phone at night unless someone has published those facts somewhere they can read. The website is where the funeral director publishes them in its own words.

  • Source of truth. The one place where services, areas covered, prices and contact details are stated by the business itself, rather than guessed at by a directory.
  • Verification after a recommendation. A family given a name by an AI assistant, a friend or a hospice nurse usually checks before calling. The website is where that check happens.
  • Compliance. In the UK, the website is the expected home for the CMA Standardised Price List and related information.
  • First-hand content. Named people, photographs of the premises, funeral notices and local knowledge that no aggregator can invent.
  • Contact and action. A clear telephone number, 24-hour availability and a way to begin arrangements, for people now and for software later.

This is where independent funeral directors hold a natural advantage. An AI system cannot fabricate a named proprietor, three generations of family ownership or a genuine connection to a town. It can only repeat those facts when the funeral director has published them clearly.

How should a funeral home prepare its website for AI search and AI agents?

Prepare a funeral home website for AI search by making its facts complete, consistent and easy to read: services, service area, availability and prices stated in plain text, matching the Google Business Profile, with first-hand content and a phone line that is always answered. Google says no special AI files, formats or markup are needed to appear in its AI features.

Most of this is not new. It is good practice that AI has made more important. Start with step 1, because every later step relies on the facts being consistent:

  1. Check every fact matches. Name, address, telephone number, hours and services should be identical on the website, the Google Business Profile and the main directories.
  2. State services in plain words. Burial, cremation, direct cremation, transfers from hospitals and care homes, 24-hour availability, religious and cultural services, and the towns and villages covered, written as page text rather than implied.
  3. Keep prices easy to find. In the UK, the Standardised Price List should be one link from the home page as the CMA requires. Add a short HTML summary of price guidance as well, since a PDF on its own is harder for families and machines to read.
  4. Show real people and places. Named funeral directors with short biographies, photographs of the premises and genuine local knowledge. This is the first-hand detail that shapes how AI assistants choose which funeral directors to recommend.
  5. Publish notices on the website. Put funeral notices on the funeral home’s own site as well as on the notice platforms families use.
  6. Use structured data that matches the page. Schema markup should describe what visitors can see. Google’s guidance is explicit that “structured data isn’t required for generative AI search” and that there is no need for llms.txt files or AI-only versions of pages [2].
  7. Make sure the phone is answered. AI calling is a US beta today, but answered phones already decide funeral enquiries. A person, not a long menu, should pick up at any hour.
  8. Measure calls, not clicks. Track calls, enquiries and arrangements, and check whether your funeral home appears in AI search at regular intervals.
Illustrative funeral director home page with numbered callouts on the 24-hour phone number, services, areas covered, price list link and named team, all stated as plain text
Illustrative example, not a real website. Each highlighted fact is written as plain page text that families and AI search tools can read.

Together, these steps make the funeral director easy to understand, for a family on a phone at midnight and for the systems that increasingly answer on that family’s behalf.

Will AI agents replace funeral home websites entirely?

There is no evidence that AI agents will replace funeral home websites entirely. The agent tools that exist are early, largely US-only and still being corrected, and Google’s CEO estimates only about 0.1% of people are living this future today. More discovery will happen through AI, and that AI will still draw on websites.

Meta’s Muse assistant is a useful reality check. In September 2026 Meta began a beta that lets Muse place calls to US businesses [5]. Within days, Reuters reported that Meta had been testing a “human concierge” in which contractors quietly handled some of those calls. A Meta vice president said it was “a miss” to test contractor-placed calls without proper disclosure, and that Meta had “rolled back this feature” for now [19]. The technology is real, but it is not finished.

Funeral arrangements add a further limit. They involve grief, cultural and religious detail, and judgement about people. It is reasonable to expect AI to take on more of the research and logistics, such as finding options, comparing prices and checking availability. The choice of who to trust with someone who has died is likely to stay with families, made after speaking to a person.

The sensible planning assumption for the next year or two is more AI-mediated discovery, not the end of the website. The discipline of being found and cited by those systems is generative engine optimisation, and it starts with the website.

Frequently asked questions

Does a funeral home need a website if it has a Google Business Profile?

Yes, a funeral home still needs a website if it has a Google Business Profile. The profile helps families find the business and call it, but Google controls it, it cannot hold permanent funeral notices or detailed service pages, and in the UK it is not a practical home for the full price information the CMA requires. The two work together: one gets a funeral director found, the other helps families choose.

Will AI make funeral home websites obsolete?

No. AI is unlikely to make funeral home websites obsolete, because AI answers are built from web content. Google states that its generative AI features are rooted in its core Search ranking and quality systems. What AI is changing is how often people click through, so the website’s value will come from being the accurate source that AI and families check, not from raw visitor numbers.

No, a website is not strictly a legal requirement for a UK funeral director. The CMA Funerals Market Investigation Order 2021 requires price information to be published online, though. A firm with a website must show its Standardised Price List there, one link from the home page. A firm without a website that markets itself online must publish the information on those online channels instead.

Why is my funeral home website getting fewer visitors?

A funeral home website is usually getting fewer visitors because Google now answers more searches directly on the results page, through AI Overviews and the Local Pack. Informational questions about costs or what to do when someone dies lose the most clicks. Fewer visitors is not the same as fewer enquiries, so check calls and arrangements before drawing conclusions.

Agentic search is search that completes a task for the user rather than returning a list of links. Software agents gather information across several sources and act on it, for example comparing options or placing a call. Google’s CEO described Search becoming an agent manager in April 2026. For funeral homes, most of this is still early and largely US-only.

Can ChatGPT recommend a funeral director without visiting its website?

Yes, ChatGPT can recommend a funeral director without visiting its website, because it also draws on directories, review platforms, news and other third-party sources. That is exactly the risk: if the funeral director’s own information is thin or missing, ChatGPT describes the business using whatever other sites say. Accurate first-party information improves what AI tools say.

Should funeral notices go on our own website or a notices platform?

Funeral notices should go on both a funeral home’s own website and the notice platforms families already use. Platforms reach people who search there, while notices on the funeral home’s own site make the business the original source that search engines and AI tools can cite. Publishing only on a platform hands that source role to the platform.

Does a funeral home need an llms.txt file?

No, a funeral home does not need an llms.txt file to appear in Google’s AI features. Google’s guidance says site owners do not need to create new machine-readable files, AI text files, markup or Markdown versions of pages to appear in Google Search. Time is better spent making the visible page content complete and accurate.

What should a funeral home website include as AI search grows?

As AI search grows, a funeral home website should include clearly stated services, named service areas, 24-hour contact details, price information (in the UK, the CMA Standardised Price List one link from the home page), named staff and premises, funeral notices, and answers to the questions families ask. Every fact should match the Google Business Profile and directory listings.

How do I know whether AI tools are finding my funeral home?

To know whether AI tools are finding a funeral home, ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google’s AI Mode the questions local families ask, using the same fixed list of questions each month, and record whether the business is named, what is said about it and which sources are cited. Compare the results with calls and enquiries over the same period.

What this means for a funeral home right now

The question is no longer whether a funeral home needs a website. It is what the website is for. Over the next few years its job is to be the accurate, first-hand source that Google, AI assistants and families all check, and in the UK the compliant home for published prices.

That work does not sit in isolation. Search, AI answers, the Google Business Profile, notices and content all feed the same picture of a funeral director. IFM runs them as one integrated visibility system for a single independent funeral director in each territory. If you would like to see where your firm stands, start with AI search optimisation for funeral homes.

References

  1. [1] Cheeky Pint, The history and future of AI at Google, with Sundar Pichai, hosted by John Collison with Elad Gil, cheekypint.substack.com/p/the-history-and-future-of-ai-at-google, 7 April 2026
  2. [2] Google Search Central, Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search, developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/ai-optimization-guide
  3. [3] Agentic AI Foundation, A2A joins AAIF’s open agentic stack, aaif.io/blog/a2a-joins-aaif, 17 August 2026
  4. [4] Google Developers Blog, All the news from the Google I/O 2026 Developer keynote, developers.googleblog.com/all-the-news-from-the-google-io-2026-developer-keynote, 19 May 2026
  5. [5] TechCrunch, Rival AI agents, Instinct and Meta’s Muse, both add the ability to make calls, techcrunch.com/2026/09/17/rival-ai-agents-instinct-and-metas-muse-both-add-the-ability-to-make-calls, 17 September 2026
  6. [6] SparkToro, When Google stops sending clicks, what still works?, sparktoro.com/blog/zero-click-search-what-still-works, 10 June 2026
  7. [7] SparkToro, 2024 Zero-Click Search Study, sparktoro.com/blog/2024-zero-click-search-study-for-every-1000-us-google-searches-only-374-clicks-go-to-the-open-web-in-the-eu-its-360, 2 July 2024
  8. [8] Ahrefs, Ryan Law, 10 SEO trends I’ve seen firsthand in 2026 (with data), ahrefs.com/blog/seo-trends, 18 June 2026
  9. [9] Ahrefs, Ryan Law, AI Overviews reduce clicks by 34.5%, ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overviews-reduce-clicks, 17 April 2025
  10. [10] Pew Research Center, Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results, pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/22/google-users-are-less-likely-to-click-on-links-when-an-ai-summary-appears-in-the-results, 22 July 2025
  11. [11] Agarwal, S. and Sen, A., Indian School of Business and Carnegie Mellon University, randomised field experiment on AI Overviews (working paper, not peer reviewed), papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6513059, 3 April 2026
  12. [12] Seer Interactive, AIO impact on Google CTR: 2026 update, seerinteractive.com/insights/aio-impact-on-google-ctr-2026-update, April 2026
  13. [13] Semrush, Semrush AI Overviews study, semrush.com/blog/semrush-ai-overviews-study, updated 15 December 2025
  14. [14] The Register, Google statement in response to the Pew Research Center study, theregister.com/software/2025/07/22/google-ai-overviews-are-killing-the-web-pew-study/857001, 22 July 2025
  15. [15] IFM analysis of DataForSEO LLM Mentions data, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, United States, retrieved 23 September 2026, dataforseo.com
  16. [16] GOV.UK, Competition and Markets Authority, Funeral directors with 4 or fewer branches, gov.uk/government/publications/working-with-the-funerals-market-investigation-order/funeral-directors-with-4-or-fewer-branches, updated 21 January 2025
  17. [17] GOV.UK, Competition and Markets Authority, Funeral directors and crematorium operators guidance, gov.uk/government/publications/working-with-the-funerals-market-investigation-order/funeral-directors-and-crematorium-operators-guidance
  18. [18] National Funeral Directors Association, 2025 Consumer Awareness and Preferences Study release, republished by Connecting Directors, connectingdirectors.com/71605-nfda-consumer-awareness-and-preferences-study, October 2025
  19. [19] Reuters via BNN Bloomberg, Meta testing a human concierge for its new personal AI agent, Muse, bnnbloomberg.ca/business/artificial-intelligence/2026/09/22/meta-testing-a-human-concierge-for-its-new-personal-ai-agent-muse-reuters-exclusive, 22 September 2026